{"intvolume":"        14","extern":1,"type":"journal_article","date_updated":"2021-01-12T08:21:47Z","publist_id":"6750","volume":14,"abstract":[{"text":"We compare the functional spectrum of protein evolution in two separate animal lineages with respect to two hypotheses: (1) rates of divergence are distributed similarly among functional classes within both lineages, indicating that selective pressure on the proteome is largely independent of organismic-level biological requirements; and (2) rates of divergence are distributed differently among functional classes within each lineage, indicating species-specific selective regimes impact genome-wide substitutional patterns. Integrating comparative genome sequence with data from tissue-specific expressed-sequence-tag (EST) libraries and detailed database annotations, we find a functional genomic signature of rapid evolution and selective constraint shared between mammalian and nematode lineages despite their extensive morphological and ecological differences and distant common ancestry. In both phyla, we find evidence of accelerated evolution among components of molecular systems involved in coevolutionary change. In mammals, lineage-specific fast evolving genes include those involved in reproduction, immunity, and possibly, maternal-fetal conflict. Likelihood ratio tests provide evidence for positive selection in these rapidly evolving functional categories in mammals. In contrast, slowly evolving genes, in terms of amino acid or insertion/deletion (indel) change, in both phyla are involved in core molecular processes such as transcription, translation, and protein transport. Thus, strong purifying selection appears to act on the same core cellular processes in both mammalian and nematode lineages, whereas positive and/or relaxed selection acts on different biological processes in each lineage.","lang":"eng"}],"publication":"Genome Research","issue":"5","publication_status":"published","quality_controlled":0,"title":"The functional genomic distribution of protein divergence in two animal phyla: Coevolution, genomic conflict, and constraint","_id":"902","author":[{"last_name":"Castillo Davis","full_name":"Castillo-Davis, Cristian I","first_name":"Cristian"},{"orcid":"0000-0001-8243-4694","full_name":"Fyodor Kondrashov","first_name":"Fyodor","id":"44FDEF62-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","last_name":"Kondrashov"},{"first_name":"Daniel","full_name":"Hartl, Daniel L","last_name":"Hartl"},{"first_name":"Rob","full_name":"Kulathinal, Rob J","last_name":"Kulathinal"}],"doi":"10.1101/gr.2195604","month":"05","date_created":"2018-12-11T11:49:06Z","citation":{"short":"C. Castillo Davis, F. Kondrashov, D. Hartl, R. Kulathinal, Genome Research 14 (2004) 802–811.","ama":"Castillo Davis C, Kondrashov F, Hartl D, Kulathinal R. The functional genomic distribution of protein divergence in two animal phyla: Coevolution, genomic conflict, and constraint. <i>Genome Research</i>. 2004;14(5):802-811. doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2195604\">10.1101/gr.2195604</a>","mla":"Castillo Davis, Cristian, et al. “The Functional Genomic Distribution of Protein Divergence in Two Animal Phyla: Coevolution, Genomic Conflict, and Constraint.” <i>Genome Research</i>, vol. 14, no. 5, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2004, pp. 802–11, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2195604\">10.1101/gr.2195604</a>.","ieee":"C. Castillo Davis, F. Kondrashov, D. Hartl, and R. Kulathinal, “The functional genomic distribution of protein divergence in two animal phyla: Coevolution, genomic conflict, and constraint,” <i>Genome Research</i>, vol. 14, no. 5. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 802–811, 2004.","ista":"Castillo Davis C, Kondrashov F, Hartl D, Kulathinal R. 2004. The functional genomic distribution of protein divergence in two animal phyla: Coevolution, genomic conflict, and constraint. Genome Research. 14(5), 802–811.","chicago":"Castillo Davis, Cristian, Fyodor Kondrashov, Daniel Hartl, and Rob Kulathinal. “The Functional Genomic Distribution of Protein Divergence in Two Animal Phyla: Coevolution, Genomic Conflict, and Constraint.” <i>Genome Research</i>. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2004. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2195604\">https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2195604</a>.","apa":"Castillo Davis, C., Kondrashov, F., Hartl, D., &#38; Kulathinal, R. (2004). The functional genomic distribution of protein divergence in two animal phyla: Coevolution, genomic conflict, and constraint. <i>Genome Research</i>. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2195604\">https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2195604</a>"},"acknowledgement":"We thank all members of the Hartl lab for their friendly support and Guillaume Achaz for valuable comments. We also thank the Sanger Institute and the Genome Sequencing Center at Wash- ington University, St. Louis and Lincoln Stein for providing un- finished C. briggsae sequence. Special thanks to the Bauer Center for Genomics Research at Harvard University and Gordon Kindl- mann at the University of Utah Scientific Computing and Imag- ing Institute for computational resources. R.J.K. is financially supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.\nThe publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.","date_published":"2004-05-01T00:00:00Z","day":"01","status":"public","year":"2004","publisher":"Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press","page":"802 - 811"}