{"has_accepted_license":"1","publication":"Logical Methods in Computer Science","author":[{"first_name":"Krishnendu","last_name":"Chatterjee","full_name":"Chatterjee, Krishnendu","id":"2E5DCA20-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","orcid":"0000-0002-4561-241X"},{"orcid":"0000−0002−2985−7724","last_name":"Henzinger","first_name":"Thomas A","full_name":"Henzinger, Thomas A","id":"40876CD8-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87"},{"first_name":"Rasmus","last_name":"Ibsen-Jensen","full_name":"Ibsen-Jensen, Rasmus","id":"3B699956-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","orcid":"0000-0003-4783-0389"},{"full_name":"Otop, Jan","last_name":"Otop","first_name":"Jan"}],"doi":"10.23638/LMCS-13(3:23)2017","publication_identifier":{"issn":["18605974"]},"citation":{"ista":"Chatterjee K, Henzinger TA, Ibsen-Jensen R, Otop J. 2017. Edit distance for pushdown automata. Logical Methods in Computer Science. 13(3).","apa":"Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T. A., Ibsen-Jensen, R., & Otop, J. (2017). Edit distance for pushdown automata. Logical Methods in Computer Science. International Federation of Computational Logic. https://doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-13(3:23)2017","chicago":"Chatterjee, Krishnendu, Thomas A Henzinger, Rasmus Ibsen-Jensen, and Jan Otop. “Edit Distance for Pushdown Automata.” Logical Methods in Computer Science. International Federation of Computational Logic, 2017. https://doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-13(3:23)2017.","ama":"Chatterjee K, Henzinger TA, Ibsen-Jensen R, Otop J. Edit distance for pushdown automata. Logical Methods in Computer Science. 2017;13(3). doi:10.23638/LMCS-13(3:23)2017","short":"K. Chatterjee, T.A. Henzinger, R. Ibsen-Jensen, J. Otop, Logical Methods in Computer Science 13 (2017).","mla":"Chatterjee, Krishnendu, et al. “Edit Distance for Pushdown Automata.” Logical Methods in Computer Science, vol. 13, no. 3, International Federation of Computational Logic, 2017, doi:10.23638/LMCS-13(3:23)2017.","ieee":"K. Chatterjee, T. A. Henzinger, R. Ibsen-Jensen, and J. Otop, “Edit distance for pushdown automata,” Logical Methods in Computer Science, vol. 13, no. 3. International Federation of Computational Logic, 2017."},"ec_funded":1,"_id":"465","pubrep_id":"955","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"volume":13,"publist_id":"7356","intvolume":" 13","year":"2017","file_date_updated":"2020-07-14T12:46:33Z","project":[{"name":"Moderne Concurrency Paradigms","_id":"25F5A88A-B435-11E9-9278-68D0E5697425","grant_number":"S11402-N23","call_identifier":"FWF"},{"name":"Modern Graph Algorithmic Techniques in Formal Verification","_id":"2584A770-B435-11E9-9278-68D0E5697425","grant_number":"P 23499-N23","call_identifier":"FWF"},{"call_identifier":"FWF","grant_number":"Z211","name":"The Wittgenstein Prize","_id":"25F42A32-B435-11E9-9278-68D0E5697425"},{"name":"Quantitative Reactive Modeling","_id":"25EE3708-B435-11E9-9278-68D0E5697425","grant_number":"267989","call_identifier":"FP7"},{"call_identifier":"FP7","grant_number":"279307","_id":"2581B60A-B435-11E9-9278-68D0E5697425","name":"Quantitative Graph Games: Theory and Applications"},{"grant_number":"S11407","_id":"25863FF4-B435-11E9-9278-68D0E5697425","name":"Game Theory","call_identifier":"FWF"}],"ddc":["004"],"day":"13","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/","type":"journal_article","file":[{"checksum":"08041379ba408d40664f449eb5907a8f","relation":"main_file","content_type":"application/pdf","access_level":"open_access","creator":"system","file_name":"IST-2015-321-v1+1_main.pdf","date_updated":"2020-07-14T12:46:33Z","file_id":"5090","date_created":"2018-12-12T10:14:37Z","file_size":279071},{"date_updated":"2020-07-14T12:46:33Z","file_size":279071,"date_created":"2018-12-12T10:14:38Z","file_id":"5091","checksum":"08041379ba408d40664f449eb5907a8f","relation":"main_file","access_level":"open_access","creator":"system","file_name":"IST-2018-955-v1+1_2017_Chatterjee_Edit_distance.pdf","content_type":"application/pdf"}],"date_updated":"2023-02-23T12:26:25Z","tmp":{"legal_code_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/legalcode","name":"Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0)","image":"/image/cc_by_nd.png","short":"CC BY-ND (4.0)"},"month":"09","issue":"3","date_published":"2017-09-13T00:00:00Z","publication_status":"published","abstract":[{"text":"The edit distance between two words w 1 , w 2 is the minimal number of word operations (letter insertions, deletions, and substitutions) necessary to transform w 1 to w 2 . The edit distance generalizes to languages L 1 , L 2 , where the edit distance from L 1 to L 2 is the minimal number k such that for every word from L 1 there exists a word in L 2 with edit distance at most k . We study the edit distance computation problem between pushdown automata and their subclasses. The problem of computing edit distance to a pushdown automaton is undecidable, and in practice, the interesting question is to compute the edit distance from a pushdown automaton (the implementation, a standard model for programs with recursion) to a regular language (the specification). In this work, we present a complete picture of decidability and complexity for the following problems: (1) deciding whether, for a given threshold k , the edit distance from a pushdown automaton to a finite automaton is at most k , and (2) deciding whether the edit distance from a pushdown automaton to a finite automaton is finite. ","lang":"eng"}],"department":[{"_id":"KrCh"},{"_id":"ToHe"}],"user_id":"2DF688A6-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","date_created":"2018-12-11T11:46:37Z","oa_version":"Published Version","oa":1,"scopus_import":1,"publisher":"International Federation of Computational Logic","status":"public","related_material":{"record":[{"status":"public","relation":"earlier_version","id":"1610"},{"status":"public","relation":"earlier_version","id":"5438"}]},"title":"Edit distance for pushdown automata","quality_controlled":"1"}