{"volume":120,"publist_id":"1720","intvolume":"       120","year":"1986","acknowledgement":"We would like to thank M. Bulmer for his helpful comments. R. J. Post was supported during this work by an MRC Postdoctoral Fellowship, and N. Barton by an SRC Postdoctoral Fellowship. \r\n","author":[{"id":"4880FE40-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","full_name":"Barton, Nicholas H","last_name":"Barton","first_name":"Nicholas H","orcid":"0000-0002-8548-5240"},{"last_name":"Post","first_name":"R.J.","full_name":"Post, R.J."}],"publication":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","doi":"10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80033-9","page":"381 - 387","publication_identifier":{"eissn":["1095-8541"],"issn":["0022-5193"]},"citation":{"ieee":"N. H. Barton and R. J. Post, “Sibling competition and the advantage of mixed families,” <i>Journal of Theoretical Biology</i>, vol. 120, no. 4. Elsevier, pp. 381–387, 1986.","mla":"Barton, Nicholas H., and R. J. Post. “Sibling Competition and the Advantage of Mixed Families.” <i>Journal of Theoretical Biology</i>, vol. 120, no. 4, Elsevier, 1986, pp. 381–87, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80033-9\">10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80033-9</a>.","short":"N.H. Barton, R.J. Post, Journal of Theoretical Biology 120 (1986) 381–387.","ama":"Barton NH, Post RJ. Sibling competition and the advantage of mixed families. <i>Journal of Theoretical Biology</i>. 1986;120(4):381-387. doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80033-9\">10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80033-9</a>","chicago":"Barton, Nicholas H, and R.J. Post. “Sibling Competition and the Advantage of Mixed Families.” <i>Journal of Theoretical Biology</i>. Elsevier, 1986. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80033-9\">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80033-9</a>.","ista":"Barton NH, Post RJ. 1986. Sibling competition and the advantage of mixed families. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 120(4), 381–387.","apa":"Barton, N. H., &#38; Post, R. J. (1986). Sibling competition and the advantage of mixed families. <i>Journal of Theoretical Biology</i>. Elsevier. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80033-9\">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80033-9</a>"},"article_type":"original","_id":"4323","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"date_created":"2018-12-11T12:08:15Z","user_id":"ea97e931-d5af-11eb-85d4-e6957dddbf17","oa_version":"None","publisher":"Elsevier","status":"public","title":"Sibling competition and the advantage of mixed families","quality_controlled":"1","day":"21","type":"journal_article","date_updated":"2022-01-31T14:44:50Z","article_processing_charge":"No","month":"06","issue":"4","extern":"1","publication_status":"published","date_published":"1986-06-21T00:00:00Z","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"It is noted that the sibling competition model for the evolution of sex and recombination, as it has been developed so far, involves truncation selection. After briefly reviewing aspects of the development and behaviour of such models an analytical treatment is presented which involves additive selection. Additive selection, as compared with truncation selection, decreases the advantage of sex to such an extent that it is unlikely that sibling competition could overcome its intrinsic two-fold cost, although it could still be important in promoting family variability produced by other mechanisms, such as polyandry."}]}