@article{1539,
  abstract     = {Many stochastic models of biochemical reaction networks contain some chemical species for which the number of molecules that are present in the system can only be finite (for instance due to conservation laws), but also other species that can be present in arbitrarily large amounts. The prime example of such networks are models of gene expression, which typically contain a small and finite number of possible states for the promoter but an infinite number of possible states for the amount of mRNA and protein. One of the main approaches to analyze such models is through the use of equations for the time evolution of moments of the chemical species. Recently, a new approach based on conditional moments of the species with infinite state space given all the different possible states of the finite species has been proposed. It was argued that this approach allows one to capture more details about the full underlying probability distribution with a smaller number of equations. Here, I show that the result that less moments provide more information can only stem from an unnecessarily complicated description of the system in the classical formulation. The foundation of this argument will be the derivation of moment equations that describe the complete probability distribution over the finite state space but only low-order moments over the infinite state space. I will show that the number of equations that is needed is always less than what was previously claimed and always less than the number of conditional moment equations up to the same order. To support these arguments, a symbolic algorithm is provided that can be used to derive minimal systems of unconditional moment equations for models with partially finite state space. },
  author       = {Ruess, Jakob},
  journal      = {Journal of Chemical Physics},
  number       = {24},
  publisher    = {American Institute of Physics},
  title        = {{Minimal moment equations for stochastic models of biochemical reaction networks with partially finite state space}},
  doi          = {10.1063/1.4937937},
  volume       = {143},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1541,
  abstract     = {We present XSpeed a parallel state-space exploration algorithm for continuous systems with linear dynamics and nondeterministic inputs. The motivation of having parallel algorithms is to exploit the computational power of multi-core processors to speed-up performance. The parallelization is achieved on two fronts. First, we propose a parallel implementation of the support function algorithm by sampling functions in parallel. Second, we propose a parallel state-space exploration by slicing the time horizon and computing the reachable states in the time slices in parallel. The second method can be however applied only to a class of linear systems with invertible dynamics and fixed input. A GP-GPU implementation is also presented following a lazy evaluation strategy on support functions. The parallel algorithms are implemented in the tool XSpeed. We evaluated the performance on two benchmarks including an 28 dimension Helicopter model. Comparison with the sequential counterpart shows a maximum speed-up of almost 7× on a 6 core, 12 thread Intel Xeon CPU E5-2420 processor. Our GP-GPU implementation shows a maximum speed-up of 12× over the sequential implementation and 53× over SpaceEx (LGG scenario), the state of the art tool for reachability analysis of linear hybrid systems. Experiments illustrate that our parallel algorithm with time slicing not only speeds-up performance but also improves precision.},
  author       = {Ray, Rajarshi and Gurung, Amit and Das, Binayak and Bartocci, Ezio and Bogomolov, Sergiy and Grosu, Radu},
  location     = {Haifa, Israel},
  pages        = {3 -- 18},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{XSpeed: Accelerating reachability analysis on multi-core processors}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-26287-1_1},
  volume       = {9434},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1594,
  abstract     = {Quantitative extensions of temporal logics have recently attracted significant attention. In this work, we study frequency LTL (fLTL), an extension of LTL which allows to speak about frequencies of events along an execution. Such an extension is particularly useful for probabilistic systems that often cannot fulfil strict qualitative guarantees on the behaviour. It has been recently shown that controller synthesis for Markov decision processes and fLTL is decidable when all the bounds on frequencies are 1. As a step towards a complete quantitative solution, we show that the problem is decidable for the fragment fLTL\GU, where U does not occur in the scope of G (but still F can). Our solution is based on a novel translation of such quantitative formulae into equivalent deterministic automata.},
  author       = {Forejt, Vojtěch and Krčál, Jan and Kretinsky, Jan},
  location     = {Suva, Fiji},
  pages        = {162 -- 177},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Controller synthesis for MDPs and frequency LTL\GU}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-662-48899-7_12},
  volume       = {9450},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1601,
  abstract     = {We propose a flexible exchange format for ω-automata, as typically used in formal verification, and implement support for it in a range of established tools. Our aim is to simplify the interaction of tools, helping the research community to build upon other people’s work. A key feature of the format is the use of very generic acceptance conditions, specified by Boolean combinations of acceptance primitives, rather than being limited to common cases such as Büchi, Streett, or Rabin. Such flexibility in the choice of acceptance conditions can be exploited in applications, for example in probabilistic model checking, and furthermore encourages the development of acceptance-agnostic tools for automata manipulations. The format allows acceptance conditions that are either state-based or transition-based, and also supports alternating automata.},
  author       = {Babiak, Tomáš and Blahoudek, František and Duret Lutz, Alexandre and Klein, Joachim and Kretinsky, Jan and Mueller, Daniel and Parker, David and Strejček, Jan},
  location     = {San Francisco, CA, United States},
  pages        = {479 -- 486},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{The Hanoi omega-automata format}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-21690-4_31},
  volume       = {9206},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1603,
  abstract     = {For deterministic systems, a counterexample to a property can simply be an error trace, whereas counterexamples in probabilistic systems are necessarily more complex. For instance, a set of erroneous traces with a sufficient cumulative probability mass can be used. Since these are too large objects to understand and manipulate, compact representations such as subchains have been considered. In the case of probabilistic systems with non-determinism, the situation is even more complex. While a subchain for a given strategy (or scheduler, resolving non-determinism) is a straightforward choice, we take a different approach. Instead, we focus on the strategy itself, and extract the most important decisions it makes, and present its succinct representation.
The key tools we employ to achieve this are (1) introducing a concept of importance of a state w.r.t. the strategy, and (2) learning using decision trees. There are three main consequent advantages of our approach. Firstly, it exploits the quantitative information on states, stressing the more important decisions. Secondly, it leads to a greater variability and degree of freedom in representing the strategies. Thirdly, the representation uses a self-explanatory data structure. In summary, our approach produces more succinct and more explainable strategies, as opposed to e.g. binary decision diagrams. Finally, our experimental results show that we can extract several rules describing the strategy even for very large systems that do not fit in memory, and based on the rules explain the erroneous behaviour.},
  author       = {Brázdil, Tomáš and Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Chmelik, Martin and Fellner, Andreas and Kretinsky, Jan},
  location     = {San Francisco, CA, United States},
  pages        = {158 -- 177},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Counterexample explanation by learning small strategies in Markov decision processes}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-21690-4_10},
  volume       = {9206},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1605,
  abstract     = {Multiaffine hybrid automata (MHA) represent a powerful formalism to model complex dynamical systems. This formalism is particularly suited for the representation of biological systems which often exhibit highly non-linear behavior. In this paper, we consider the problem of parameter identification for MHA. We present an abstraction of MHA based on linear hybrid automata, which can be analyzed by the SpaceEx model checker. This abstraction enables a precise handling of time-dependent properties. We demonstrate the potential of our approach on a model of a genetic regulatory network and a myocyte model.},
  author       = {Bogomolov, Sergiy and Schilling, Christian and Bartocci, Ezio and Batt, Grégory and Kong, Hui and Grosu, Radu},
  location     = {Haifa, Israel},
  pages        = {19 -- 35},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Abstraction-based parameter synthesis for multiaffine systems}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-26287-1_2},
  volume       = {9434},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1606,
  abstract     = {In this paper, we present the first steps toward a runtime verification framework for monitoring hybrid and cyber-physical systems (CPS) development tools based on randomized differential testing. The development tools include hybrid systems reachability analysis tools, model-based development environments like Simulink/Stateflow (SLSF), etc. First, hybrid automaton models are randomly generated. Next, these hybrid automaton models are translated to a number of different tools (currently, SpaceEx, dReach, Flow*, HyCreate, and the MathWorks’ Simulink/Stateflow) using the HyST source transformation and translation tool. Then, the hybrid automaton models are executed in the different tools and their outputs are parsed. The final step is the differential comparison: the outputs of the different tools are compared. If the results do not agree (in the sense that an analysis or verification result from one tool does not match that of another tool, ignoring timeouts, etc.), a candidate bug is flagged and the model is saved for future analysis by the user. The process then repeats and the monitoring continues until the user terminates the process. We present preliminary results that have been useful in identifying a few bugs in the analysis methods of different development tools, and in an earlier version of HyST.},
  author       = {Nguyen, Luan and Schilling, Christian and Bogomolov, Sergiy and Johnson, Taylor},
  booktitle    = {6th International Conference},
  isbn         = {978-3-319-23819-7},
  location     = {Vienna, Austria},
  pages        = {281 -- 286},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Runtime verification for hybrid analysis tools}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-23820-3_19},
  volume       = {9333},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1610,
  abstract     = {The edit distance between two words w1, w2 is the minimal number of word operations (letter insertions, deletions, and substitutions) necessary to transform w1 to w2. The edit distance generalizes to languages L1,L2, where the edit distance is the minimal number k such that for every word from L1 there exists a word in L2 with edit distance at most k. We study the edit distance computation problem between pushdown automata and their subclasses. The problem of computing edit distance to pushdown automata is undecidable, and in practice, the interesting question is to compute the edit distance from a pushdown automaton (the implementation, a standard model for programs with recursion) to a regular language (the specification). In this work, we present a complete picture of decidability and complexity for deciding whether, for a given threshold k, the edit distance from a pushdown automaton to a finite automaton is at most k.},
  author       = {Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Henzinger, Thomas A and Ibsen-Jensen, Rasmus and Otop, Jan},
  booktitle    = {42nd International Colloquium},
  isbn         = {978-3-662-47665-9},
  location     = {Kyoto, Japan},
  number       = {Part II},
  pages        = {121 -- 133},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Edit distance for pushdown automata}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_10},
  volume       = {9135},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1656,
  abstract     = {Recently there has been a significant effort to handle quantitative properties in formal verification and synthesis. While weighted automata over finite and infinite words provide a natural and flexible framework to express quantitative properties, perhaps surprisingly, some basic system properties such as average response time cannot be expressed using weighted automata, nor in any other know decidable formalism. In this work, we introduce nested weighted automata as a natural extension of weighted automata which makes it possible to express important quantitative properties such as average response time. In nested weighted automata, a master automaton spins off and collects results from weighted slave automata, each of which computes a quantity along a finite portion of an infinite word. Nested weighted automata can be viewed as the quantitative analogue of monitor automata, which are used in run-time verification. We establish an almost complete decidability picture for the basic decision problems about nested weighted automata, and illustrate their applicability in several domains. In particular, nested weighted automata can be used to decide average response time properties.},
  author       = {Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Henzinger, Thomas A and Otop, Jan},
  booktitle    = {Proceedings - Symposium on Logic in Computer Science},
  location     = {Kyoto, Japan},
  publisher    = {IEEE},
  title        = {{Nested weighted automata}},
  doi          = {10.1109/LICS.2015.72},
  volume       = {2015-July},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1657,
  abstract     = {We consider Markov decision processes (MDPs) with multiple limit-average (or mean-payoff) objectives. There exist two different views: (i) ~the expectation semantics, where the goal is to optimize the expected mean-payoff objective, and (ii) ~the satisfaction semantics, where the goal is to maximize the probability of runs such that the mean-payoff value stays above a given vector. We consider optimization with respect to both objectives at once, thus unifying the existing semantics. Precisely, the goal is to optimize the expectation while ensuring the satisfaction constraint. Our problem captures the notion of optimization with respect to strategies that are risk-averse (i.e., Ensure certain probabilistic guarantee). Our main results are as follows: First, we present algorithms for the decision problems, which are always polynomial in the size of the MDP. We also show that an approximation of the Pareto curve can be computed in time polynomial in the size of the MDP, and the approximation factor, but exponential in the number of dimensions. Second, we present a complete characterization of the strategy complexity (in terms of memory bounds and randomization) required to solve our problem. },
  author       = {Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Komárková, Zuzana and Kretinsky, Jan},
  location     = {Kyoto, Japan},
  pages        = {244 -- 256},
  publisher    = {IEEE},
  title        = {{Unifying two views on multiple mean-payoff objectives in Markov decision processes}},
  doi          = {10.1109/LICS.2015.32},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1658,
  abstract     = {Continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) models have become a central tool for understanding the dynamics of complex reaction networks and the importance of stochasticity in the underlying biochemical processes. When such models are employed to answer questions in applications, in order to ensure that the model provides a sufficiently accurate representation of the real system, it is of vital importance that the model parameters are inferred from real measured data. This, however, is often a formidable task and all of the existing methods fail in one case or the other, usually because the underlying CTMC model is high-dimensional and computationally difficult to analyze. The parameter inference methods that tend to scale best in the dimension of the CTMC are based on so-called moment closure approximations. However, there exists a large number of different moment closure approximations and it is typically hard to say a priori which of the approximations is the most suitable for the inference procedure. Here, we propose a moment-based parameter inference method that automatically chooses the most appropriate moment closure method. Accordingly, contrary to existing methods, the user is not required to be experienced in moment closure techniques. In addition to that, our method adaptively changes the approximation during the parameter inference to ensure that always the best approximation is used, even in cases where different approximations are best in different regions of the parameter space.},
  author       = {Bogomolov, Sergiy and Henzinger, Thomas A and Podelski, Andreas and Ruess, Jakob and Schilling, Christian},
  location     = {Nantes, France},
  pages        = {77 -- 89},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Adaptive moment closure for parameter inference of biochemical reaction networks}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-23401-4_8},
  volume       = {9308},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1659,
  abstract     = {The target discounted-sum problem is the following: Given a rational discount factor 0 &lt; λ &lt; 1 and three rational values a, b, and t, does there exist a finite or an infinite sequence w ε(a, b)∗ or w ε(a, b)w, such that Σ|w| i=0 w(i)λi equals t? The problem turns out to relate to many fields of mathematics and computer science, and its decidability question is surprisingly hard to solve. We solve the finite version of the problem, and show the hardness of the infinite version, linking it to various areas and open problems in mathematics and computer science: β-expansions, discounted-sum automata, piecewise affine maps, and generalizations of the Cantor set. We provide some partial results to the infinite version, among which are solutions to its restriction to eventually-periodic sequences and to the cases that λ λ 1/2 or λ = 1/n, for every n ε N. We use our results for solving some open problems on discounted-sum automata, among which are the exact-value problem for nondeterministic automata over finite words and the universality and inclusion problems for functional automata.},
  author       = {Boker, Udi and Henzinger, Thomas A and Otop, Jan},
  booktitle    = {LICS},
  issn         = {1043-6871 },
  location     = {Kyoto, Japan},
  pages        = {750 -- 761},
  publisher    = {IEEE},
  title        = {{The target discounted-sum problem}},
  doi          = {10.1109/LICS.2015.74},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1670,
  abstract     = {Planning in hybrid domains poses a special challenge due to the involved mixed discrete-continuous dynamics. A recent solving approach for such domains is based on applying model checking techniques on a translation of PDDL+ planning problems to hybrid automata. However, the proposed translation is limited because must behavior is only overapproximated, and hence, processes and events are not reflected exactly. In this paper, we present the theoretical foundation of an exact PDDL+ translation. We propose a schema to convert a hybrid automaton with must transitions into an equivalent hybrid automaton featuring only may transitions.},
  author       = {Bogomolov, Sergiy and Magazzeni, Daniele and Minopoli, Stefano and Wehrle, Martin},
  location     = {Jerusalem, Israel},
  pages        = {42 -- 46},
  publisher    = {AAAI Press},
  title        = {{PDDL+ planning with hybrid automata: Foundations of translating must behavior}},
  year         = {2015},
}

@article{1680,
  abstract     = {We consider the satisfiability problem for modal logic over first-order definable classes of frames.We confirm the conjecture from Hemaspaandra and Schnoor [2008] that modal logic is decidable over classes definable by universal Horn formulae. We provide a full classification of Horn formulae with respect to the complexity of the corresponding satisfiability problem. It turns out, that except for the trivial case of inconsistent formulae, local satisfiability is eitherNP-complete or PSPACE-complete, and global satisfiability is NP-complete, PSPACE-complete, or ExpTime-complete. We also show that the finite satisfiability problem for modal logic over Horn definable classes of frames is decidable. On the negative side, we show undecidability of two related problems. First, we exhibit a simple universal three-variable formula defining the class of frames over which modal logic is undecidable. Second, we consider the satisfiability problem of bimodal logic over Horn definable classes of frames, and also present a formula leading to undecidability.},
  author       = {Michaliszyn, Jakub and Otop, Jan and Kieroňski, Emanuel},
  journal      = {ACM Transactions on Computational Logic},
  number       = {1},
  publisher    = {ACM},
  title        = {{On the decidability of elementary modal logics}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2817825},
  volume       = {17},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1689,
  abstract     = {We consider the problem of computing the set of initial states of a dynamical system such that there exists a control strategy to ensure that the trajectories satisfy a temporal logic specification with probability 1 (almost-surely). We focus on discrete-time, stochastic linear dynamics and specifications given as formulas of the Generalized Reactivity(1) fragment of Linear Temporal Logic over linear predicates in the states of the system. We propose a solution based on iterative abstraction-refinement, and turn-based 2-player probabilistic games. While the theoretical guarantee of our algorithm after any finite number of iterations is only a partial solution, we show that if our algorithm terminates, then the result is the set of satisfying initial states. Moreover, for any (partial) solution our algorithm synthesizes witness control strategies to ensure almost-sure satisfaction of the temporal logic specification. We demonstrate our approach on an illustrative case study.},
  author       = {Svoreňová, Mária and Kretinsky, Jan and Chmelik, Martin and Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Cěrná, Ivana and Belta, Cǎlin},
  booktitle    = {Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control},
  location     = {Seattle, WA, United States},
  pages        = {259 -- 268},
  publisher    = {ACM},
  title        = {{Temporal logic control for stochastic linear systems using abstraction refinement of probabilistic games}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2728606.2728608},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1690,
  abstract     = {A number of powerful and scalable hybrid systems model checkers have recently emerged. Although all of them honor roughly the same hybrid systems semantics, they have drastically different model description languages. This situation (a) makes it difficult to quickly evaluate a specific hybrid automaton model using the different tools, (b) obstructs comparisons of reachability approaches, and (c) impedes the widespread application of research results that perform model modification and could benefit many of the tools. In this paper, we present Hyst, a Hybrid Source Transformer. Hyst is a source-to-source translation tool, currently taking input in the SpaceEx model format, and translating to the formats of HyCreate, Flow∗, or dReach. Internally, the tool supports generic model-to-model transformation passes that serve to both ease the translation and potentially improve reachability results for the supported tools. Although these model transformation passes could be implemented within each tool, the Hyst approach provides a single place for model modification, generating modified input sources for the unmodified target tools. Our evaluation demonstrates Hyst is capable of automatically translating benchmarks in several classes (including affine and nonlinear hybrid automata) to the input formats of several tools. Additionally, we illustrate a general model transformation pass based on pseudo-invariants implemented in Hyst that illustrates the reachability improvement.},
  author       = {Bak, Stanley and Bogomolov, Sergiy and Johnson, Taylor},
  location     = {Seattle, WA, United States},
  pages        = {128 -- 133},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{HYST: A source transformation and translation tool for hybrid automaton models}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2728606.2728630},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1692,
  abstract     = {Computing an approximation of the reachable states of a hybrid system is a challenge, mainly because overapproximating the solutions of ODEs with a finite number of sets does not scale well. Using template polyhedra can greatly reduce the computational complexity, since it replaces complex operations on sets with a small number of optimization problems. However, the use of templates may make the over-approximation too conservative. Spurious transitions, which are falsely considered reachable, are particularly detrimental to performance and accuracy, and may exacerbate the state explosion problem. In this paper, we examine how spurious transitions can be avoided with minimal computational effort. To this end, detecting spurious transitions is reduced to the well-known problem of showing that two convex sets are disjoint by finding a hyperplane that separates them. We generalize this to owpipes by considering hyperplanes that evolve with time in correspondence to the dynamics of the system. The approach is implemented in the model checker SpaceEx and demonstrated on examples.},
  author       = {Frehse, Goran and Bogomolov, Sergiy and Greitschus, Marius and Strump, Thomas and Podelski, Andreas},
  booktitle    = {Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control},
  isbn         = {978-1-4503-3433-4},
  location     = {Seattle, WA, United States},
  pages        = {149 -- 158},
  publisher    = {ACM},
  title        = {{Eliminating spurious transitions in reachability with support functions}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2728606.2728622},
  year         = {2015},
}

@article{1698,
  abstract     = {In mean-payoff games, the objective of the protagonist is to ensure that the limit average of an infinite sequence of numeric weights is nonnegative. In energy games, the objective is to ensure that the running sum of weights is always nonnegative. Multi-mean-payoff and multi-energy games replace individual weights by tuples, and the limit average (resp., running sum) of each coordinate must be (resp., remain) nonnegative. We prove finite-memory determinacy of multi-energy games and show inter-reducibility of multi-mean-payoff and multi-energy games for finite-memory strategies. We improve the computational complexity for solving both classes with finite-memory strategies: we prove coNP-completeness improving the previous known EXPSPACE bound. For memoryless strategies, we show that deciding the existence of a winning strategy for the protagonist is NP-complete. We present the first solution of multi-mean-payoff games with infinite-memory strategies: we show that mean-payoff-sup objectives can be decided in NP∩coNP, whereas mean-payoff-inf objectives are coNP-complete.},
  author       = {Velner, Yaron and Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Doyen, Laurent and Henzinger, Thomas A and Rabinovich, Alexander and Raskin, Jean},
  journal      = {Information and Computation},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {177 -- 196},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  title        = {{The complexity of multi-mean-payoff and multi-energy games}},
  doi          = {10.1016/j.ic.2015.03.001},
  volume       = {241},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1729,
  abstract     = {We present a computer-aided programming approach to concurrency. The approach allows programmers to program assuming a friendly, non-preemptive scheduler, and our synthesis procedure inserts synchronization to ensure that the final program works even with a preemptive scheduler. The correctness specification is implicit, inferred from the non-preemptive behavior. Let us consider sequences of calls that the program makes to an external interface. The specification requires that any such sequence produced under a preemptive scheduler should be included in the set of such sequences produced under a non-preemptive scheduler. The solution is based on a finitary abstraction, an algorithm for bounded language inclusion modulo an independence relation, and rules for inserting synchronization. We apply the approach to device-driver programming, where the driver threads call the software interface of the device and the API provided by the operating system. Our experiments demonstrate that our synthesis method is precise and efficient, and, since it does not require explicit specifications, is more practical than the conventional approach based on user-provided assertions.},
  author       = {Cerny, Pavol and Clarke, Edmund and Henzinger, Thomas A and Radhakrishna, Arjun and Ryzhyk, Leonid and Samanta, Roopsha and Tarrach, Thorsten},
  location     = {San Francisco, CA, United States},
  pages        = {180 -- 197},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{From non-preemptive to preemptive scheduling using synchronization synthesis}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-21668-3_11},
  volume       = {9207},
  year         = {2015},
}

@article{1731,
  abstract     = {We consider two-player zero-sum games on graphs. These games can be classified on the basis of the information of the players and on the mode of interaction between them. On the basis of information the classification is as follows: (a) partial-observation (both players have partial view of the game); (b) one-sided complete-observation (one player has complete observation); and (c) complete-observation (both players have complete view of the game). On the basis of mode of interaction we have the following classification: (a) concurrent (both players interact simultaneously); and (b) turn-based (both players interact in turn). The two sources of randomness in these games are randomness in transition function and randomness in strategies. In general, randomized strategies are more powerful than deterministic strategies, and randomness in transitions gives more general classes of games. In this work we present a complete characterization for the classes of games where randomness is not helpful in: (a) the transition function probabilistic transition can be simulated by deterministic transition); and (b) strategies (pure strategies are as powerful as randomized strategies). As consequence of our characterization we obtain new undecidability results for these games. },
  author       = {Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Doyen, Laurent and Gimbert, Hugo and Henzinger, Thomas A},
  journal      = {Information and Computation},
  number       = {12},
  pages        = {3 -- 16},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  title        = {{Randomness for free}},
  doi          = {10.1016/j.ic.2015.06.003},
  volume       = {245},
  year         = {2015},
}

