@article{13266, abstract = {The 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is a versatile second messenger in many mammalian signaling pathways. However, its role in plants remains not well-recognized. Recent discovery of adenylate cyclase (AC) activity for transport inhibitor response 1/auxin-signaling F-box proteins (TIR1/AFB) auxin receptors and the demonstration of its importance for canonical auxin signaling put plant cAMP research back into spotlight. This insight briefly summarizes the well-established cAMP signaling pathways in mammalian cells and describes the turbulent and controversial history of plant cAMP research highlighting the major progress and the unresolved points. We also briefly review the current paradigm of auxin signaling to provide a background for the discussion on the AC activity of TIR1/AFB auxin receptors and its potential role in transcriptional auxin signaling as well as impact of these discoveries on plant cAMP research in general.}, author = {Qi, Linlin and Friml, Jiří}, issn = {1469-8137}, journal = {New Phytologist}, number = {2}, pages = {489--495}, publisher = {Wiley}, title = {{Tale of cAMP as a second messenger in auxin signaling and beyond}}, doi = {10.1111/nph.19123}, volume = {240}, year = {2023}, } @article{10282, abstract = {Advanced transcriptome sequencing has revealed that the majority of eukaryotic genes undergo alternative splicing (AS). Nonetheless, little effort has been dedicated to investigating the functional relevance of particular splicing events, even those in the key developmental and hormonal regulators. Combining approaches of genetics, biochemistry and advanced confocal microscopy, we describe the impact of alternative splicing on the PIN7 gene in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. PIN7 encodes a polarly localized transporter for the phytohormone auxin and produces two evolutionarily conserved transcripts, PIN7a and PIN7b. PIN7a and PIN7b, differing in a four amino acid stretch, exhibit almost identical expression patterns and subcellular localization. We reveal that they are closely associated and mutually influence each other's mobility within the plasma membrane. Phenotypic complementation tests indicate that the functional contribution of PIN7b per se is minor, but it markedly reduces the prominent PIN7a activity, which is required for correct seedling apical hook formation and auxin-mediated tropic responses. Our results establish alternative splicing of the PIN family as a conserved, functionally relevant mechanism, revealing an additional regulatory level of auxin-mediated plant development.}, author = {Kashkan, Ivan and Hrtyan, Mónika and Retzer, Katarzyna and Humpolíčková, Jana and Jayasree, Aswathy and Filepová, Roberta and Vondráková, Zuzana and Simon, Sibu and Rombaut, Debbie and Jacobs, Thomas B. and Frilander, Mikko J. and Hejátko, Jan and Friml, Jiří and Petrášek, Jan and Růžička, Kamil}, issn = {1469-8137}, journal = {New Phytologist}, pages = {329--343}, publisher = {Wiley}, title = {{Mutually opposing activity of PIN7 splicing isoforms is required for auxin-mediated tropic responses in Arabidopsis thaliana}}, doi = {10.1111/nph.17792}, volume = {233}, year = {2021}, } @article{7697, abstract = {* Morphogenesis and adaptive tropic growth in plants depend on gradients of the phytohormone auxin, mediated by the membrane‐based PIN‐FORMED (PIN) auxin transporters. PINs localize to a particular side of the plasma membrane (PM) or to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to directionally transport auxin and maintain intercellular and intracellular auxin homeostasis, respectively. However, the molecular cues that confer their diverse cellular localizations remain largely unknown. * In this study, we systematically swapped the domains between ER‐ and PM‐localized PIN proteins, as well as between apical and basal PM‐localized PINs from Arabidopsis thaliana , to shed light on why PIN family members with similar topological structures reside at different membrane compartments within cells. * Our results show that not only do the N‐ and C‐terminal transmembrane domains (TMDs) and central hydrophilic loop contribute to their differential subcellular localizations and cellular polarity, but that the pairwise‐matched N‐ and C‐terminal TMDs resulting from intramolecular domain–domain coevolution are also crucial for their divergent patterns of localization. * These findings illustrate the complexity of the evolutionary path of PIN proteins in acquiring their plethora of developmental functions and adaptive growth in plants.}, author = {Zhang, Yuzhou and Hartinger, Corinna and Wang, Xiaojuan and Friml, Jiří}, issn = {1469-8137}, journal = {New Phytologist}, number = {5}, pages = {1406--1416}, publisher = {Wiley}, title = {{Directional auxin fluxes in plants by intramolecular domain‐domain co‐evolution of PIN auxin transporters}}, doi = {10.1111/nph.16629}, volume = {227}, year = {2020}, } @article{6856, abstract = {Plant mating systems play a key role in structuring genetic variation both within and between species. In hybrid zones, the outcomes and dynamics of hybridization are usually interpreted as the balance between gene flow and selection against hybrids. Yet, mating systems can introduce selective forces that alter these expectations; with diverse outcomes for the level and direction of gene flow depending on variation in outcrossing and whether the mating systems of the species pair are the same or divergent. We present a survey of hybridization in 133 species pairs from 41 plant families and examine how patterns of hybridization vary with mating system. We examine if hybrid zone mode, level of gene flow, asymmetries in gene flow and the frequency of reproductive isolating barriers vary in relation to mating system/s of the species pair. We combine these results with a simulation model and examples from the literature to address two general themes: (i) the two‐way interaction between introgression and the evolution of reproductive systems, and (ii) how mating system can facilitate or restrict interspecific gene flow. We conclude that examining mating system with hybridization provides unique opportunities to understand divergence and the processes underlying reproductive isolation.}, author = {Pickup, Melinda and Barton, Nicholas H and Brandvain, Yaniv and Fraisse, Christelle and Yakimowski, Sarah and Dixit, Tanmay and Lexer, Christian and Cereghetti, Eva and Field, David}, issn = {1469-8137}, journal = {New Phytologist}, number = {3}, pages = {1035--1047}, publisher = {Wiley}, title = {{Mating system variation in hybrid zones: Facilitation, barriers and asymmetries to gene flow}}, doi = {10.1111/nph.16180}, volume = {224}, year = {2019}, }