@inproceedings{11355,
  abstract     = {Contract-based design is a promising methodology for taming the complexity of developing sophisticated systems. A formal contract distinguishes between assumptions, which are constraints that the designer of a component puts on the environments in which the component can be used safely, and guarantees, which are promises that the designer asks from the team that implements the component. A theory of formal contracts can be formalized as an interface theory, which supports the composition and refinement of both assumptions and guarantees.
Although there is a rich landscape of contract-based design methods that address functional and extra-functional properties, we present the first interface theory that is designed for ensuring system-wide security properties. Our framework provides a refinement relation and a composition operation that support both incremental design and independent implementability. We develop our theory for both stateless and stateful interfaces. We illustrate the applicability of our framework with an example inspired from the automotive domain.},
  author       = {Bartocci, Ezio and Ferrere, Thomas and Henzinger, Thomas A and Nickovic, Dejan and Da Costa, Ana Oliveira},
  booktitle    = {Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering},
  isbn         = {9783030994280},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Munich, Germany},
  pages        = {3--22},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Information-flow interfaces}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-99429-7_1},
  volume       = {13241},
  year         = {2022},
}

@book{11429,
  abstract     = {This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems, W2GIS 2022, held in Konstanz, Germany, in April 2022.
The 7 full papers presented together with 6 short papers in the volume were carefully reviewed and selected from 16 submissions.  The papers cover topics that range from mobile GIS and Location-Based Services to Spatial Information Retrieval and Wireless Sensor Networks.},
  editor       = {Karimipour, Farid and Storandt, Sabine},
  isbn         = {9783031062445},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  pages        = {153},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-031-06245-2},
  volume       = {13238},
  year         = {2022},
}

@inproceedings{11476,
  abstract     = {Messaging platforms like Signal are widely deployed and provide strong security in an asynchronous setting. It is a challenging problem to construct a protocol with similar security guarantees that can efficiently scale to large groups. A major bottleneck are the frequent key rotations users need to perform to achieve post compromise forward security.

In current proposals – most notably in TreeKEM (which is part of the IETF’s Messaging Layer Security (MLS) protocol draft) – for users in a group of size n to rotate their keys, they must each craft a message of size log(n) to be broadcast to the group using an (untrusted) delivery server.

In larger groups, having users sequentially rotate their keys requires too much bandwidth (or takes too long), so variants allowing any T≤n users to simultaneously rotate their keys in just 2 communication rounds have been suggested (e.g. “Propose and Commit” by MLS). Unfortunately, 2-round concurrent updates are either damaging or expensive (or both); i.e. they either result in future operations being more costly (e.g. via “blanking” or “tainting”) or are costly themselves requiring Ω(T) communication for each user [Bienstock et al., TCC’20].

In this paper we propose CoCoA; a new scheme that allows for T concurrent updates that are neither damaging nor costly. That is, they add no cost to future operations yet they only require Ω(log2(n)) communication per user. To circumvent the [Bienstock et al.] lower bound, CoCoA increases the number of rounds needed to complete all updates from 2 up to (at most) log(n); though typically fewer rounds are needed.

The key insight of our protocol is the following: in the (non-concurrent version of) TreeKEM, a delivery server which gets T concurrent update requests will approve one and reject the remaining T−1. In contrast, our server attempts to apply all of them. If more than one user requests to rotate the same key during a round, the server arbitrarily picks a winner. Surprisingly, we prove that regardless of how the server chooses the winners, all previously compromised users will recover after at most log(n) such update rounds.

To keep the communication complexity low, CoCoA is a server-aided CGKA. That is, the delivery server no longer blindly forwards packets, but instead actively computes individualized packets tailored to each user. As the server is untrusted, this change requires us to develop new mechanisms ensuring robustness of the protocol.},
  author       = {Alwen, Joël and Auerbach, Benedikt and Cueto Noval, Miguel and Klein, Karen and Pascual Perez, Guillermo and Pietrzak, Krzysztof Z and Walter, Michael},
  booktitle    = {Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2022},
  isbn         = {9783031070846},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Trondheim, Norway},
  pages        = {815–844},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{CoCoA: Concurrent continuous group key agreement}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-031-07085-3_28},
  volume       = {13276},
  year         = {2022},
}

@inproceedings{11707,
  abstract     = {In this work we introduce the graph-theoretic notion of mendability: for each locally checkable graph problem we can define its mending radius, which captures the idea of how far one needs to modify a partial solution in order to “patch a hole.” We explore how mendability is connected to the existence of efficient algorithms, especially in distributed, parallel, and fault-tolerant settings. It is easy to see that O(1)-mendable problems are also solvable in O(log∗n) rounds in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. One of the surprises is that in paths and cycles, a converse also holds in the following sense: if a problem Π can be solved in O(log∗n), there is always a restriction Π′⊆Π that is still efficiently solvable but that is also O(1)-mendable. We also explore the structure of the landscape of mendability. For example, we show that in trees, the mending radius of any locally checkable problem is O(1), Θ(logn), or Θ(n), while in general graphs the structure is much more diverse.},
  author       = {Balliu, Alkida and Hirvonen, Juho and Melnyk, Darya and Olivetti, Dennis and Rybicki, Joel and Suomela, Jukka},
  booktitle    = {International Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity},
  editor       = {Parter, Merav},
  isbn         = {9783031099922},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Paderborn, Germany},
  pages        = {1--20},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Local mending}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-031-09993-9_1},
  volume       = {13298},
  year         = {2022},
}

@inproceedings{12000,
  abstract     = {We consider the quantitative problem of obtaining lower-bounds on the probability of termination of a given non-deterministic probabilistic program. Specifically, given a non-termination threshold p∈[0,1], we aim for certificates proving that the program terminates with probability at least 1−p. The basic idea of our approach is to find a terminating stochastic invariant, i.e. a subset SI of program states such that (i) the probability of the program ever leaving SI is no more than p, and (ii) almost-surely, the program either leaves SI or terminates.

While stochastic invariants are already well-known, we provide the first proof that the idea above is not only sound, but also complete for quantitative termination analysis. We then introduce a novel sound and complete characterization of stochastic invariants that enables template-based approaches for easy synthesis of quantitative termination certificates, especially in affine or polynomial forms. Finally, by combining this idea with the existing martingale-based methods that are relatively complete for qualitative termination analysis, we obtain the first automated, sound, and relatively complete algorithm for quantitative termination analysis. Notably, our completeness guarantees for quantitative termination analysis are as strong as the best-known methods for the qualitative variant.

Our prototype implementation demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach on various probabilistic programs. We also demonstrate that our algorithm certifies lower bounds on termination probability for probabilistic programs that are beyond the reach of previous methods.},
  author       = {Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Goharshady, Amir Kafshdar and Meggendorfer, Tobias and Zikelic, Dorde},
  booktitle    = {Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification},
  isbn         = {9783031131844},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Haifa, Israel},
  pages        = {55--78},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Sound and complete certificates for auantitative termination analysis of probabilistic programs}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-031-13185-1_4},
  volume       = {13371},
  year         = {2022},
}

@inproceedings{12767,
  abstract     = {Several problems in planning and reactive synthesis can be reduced to the analysis of two-player quantitative graph games. Optimization is one form of analysis. We argue that in many cases it may be better to replace the optimization problem with the satisficing problem, where instead of searching for optimal solutions, the goal is to search for solutions that adhere to a given threshold bound.
This work defines and investigates the satisficing problem on a two-player graph game with the discounted-sum cost model. We show that while the satisficing problem can be solved using numerical methods just like the optimization problem, this approach does not render compelling benefits over optimization. When the discount factor is, however, an integer, we present another approach to satisficing, which is purely based on automata methods. We show that this approach is algorithmically more performant – both theoretically and empirically – and demonstrates the broader applicability of satisficing over optimization.},
  author       = {Bansal, Suguman and Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Vardi, Moshe Y.},
  booktitle    = {27th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems},
  isbn         = {9783030720155},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Luxembourg City, Luxembourg},
  pages        = {20--37},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{On satisficing in quantitative games}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-72016-2},
  volume       = {12651},
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{9210,
  abstract     = {Modern neural networks can easily fit their training set perfectly. Surprisingly, despite being “overfit” in this way, they tend to generalize well to future data, thereby defying the classic bias–variance trade-off of machine learning theory. Of the many possible explanations, a prevalent one is that training by stochastic gradient descent (SGD) imposes an implicit bias that leads it to learn simple functions, and these simple functions generalize well. However, the specifics of this implicit bias are not well understood.
In this work, we explore the smoothness conjecture which states that SGD is implicitly biased towards learning functions that are smooth. We propose several measures to formalize the intuitive notion of smoothness, and we conduct experiments to determine whether SGD indeed implicitly optimizes for these measures. Our findings rule out the possibility that smoothness measures based on first-order derivatives are being implicitly enforced. They are supportive, though, of the smoothness conjecture for measures based on second-order derivatives.},
  author       = {Volhejn, Vaclav and Lampert, Christoph},
  booktitle    = {42nd German Conference on Pattern Recognition},
  isbn         = {9783030712778},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Tübingen, Germany},
  pages        = {246--259},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Does SGD implicitly optimize for smoothness?}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-71278-5_18},
  volume       = {12544},
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{9227,
  abstract     = {In the multiway cut problem we are given a weighted undirected graph   G=(V,E)  and a set   T⊆V  of k terminals. The goal is to find a minimum weight set of edges   E′⊆E  with the property that by removing   E′  from G all the terminals become disconnected. In this paper we present a simple local search approximation algorithm for the multiway cut problem with approximation ratio   2−2k . We present an experimental evaluation of the performance of our local search algorithm and show that it greatly outperforms the isolation heuristic of Dalhaus et al. and it has similar performance as the much more complex algorithms of Calinescu et al., Sharma and Vondrak, and Buchbinder et al. which have the currently best known approximation ratios for this problem.},
  author       = {Bloch-Hansen, Andrew and Samei, Nasim and Solis-Oba, Roberto},
  booktitle    = {Conference on Algorithms and Discrete Applied Mathematics},
  isbn         = {9783030678982},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Rupnagar, India},
  pages        = {346--358},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Experimental evaluation of a local search approximation algorithm for the multiway cut problem}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-67899-9_28},
  volume       = {12601},
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10041,
  abstract     = {Yao’s garbling scheme is one of the most fundamental cryptographic constructions. Lindell and Pinkas (Journal of Cryptograhy 2009) gave a formal proof of security in the selective setting where the adversary chooses the challenge inputs before seeing the garbled circuit assuming secure symmetric-key encryption (and hence one-way functions). This was followed by results, both positive and negative, concerning its security in the, stronger, adaptive setting. Applebaum et al. (Crypto 2013) showed that it cannot satisfy adaptive security as is, due to a simple incompressibility argument. Jafargholi and Wichs (TCC 2017) considered a natural adaptation of Yao’s scheme (where the output mapping is sent in the online phase, together with the garbled input) that circumvents this negative result, and proved that it is adaptively secure, at least for shallow circuits. In particular, they showed that for the class of circuits of depth   δ , the loss in security is at most exponential in   δ . The above results all concern the simulation-based notion of security. In this work, we show that the upper bound of Jafargholi and Wichs is basically optimal in a strong sense. As our main result, we show that there exists a family of Boolean circuits, one for each depth  δ∈N , such that any black-box reduction proving the adaptive indistinguishability of the natural adaptation of Yao’s scheme from any symmetric-key encryption has to lose a factor that is exponential in   δ√ . Since indistinguishability is a weaker notion than simulation, our bound also applies to adaptive simulation. To establish our results, we build on the recent approach of Kamath et al. (Eprint 2021), which uses pebbling lower bounds in conjunction with oracle separations to prove fine-grained lower bounds on loss in cryptographic security.},
  author       = {Kamath Hosdurg, Chethan and Klein, Karen and Pietrzak, Krzysztof Z and Wichs, Daniel},
  booktitle    = {41st Annual International Cryptology Conference, Part II },
  isbn         = {978-3-030-84244-4},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Virtual},
  pages        = {486--515},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Limits on the Adaptive Security of Yao’s Garbling}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-84245-1_17},
  volume       = {12826},
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10076,
  abstract     = {We present a novel approach for blockchain asset owners to reclaim their funds in case of accidental private-key loss or transfer to a mistyped address. Our solution can be deployed upon failure or absence of proactively implemented backup mechanisms, such as secret sharing and cold storage. The main advantages against previous proposals is it does not require any prior action from users and works with both single-key and multi-sig accounts. We achieve this by a 3-phase   Commit()→Reveal()→Claim()−or−Challenge()  smart contract that enables accessing funds of addresses for which the spending key is not available. We provide an analysis of the threat and incentive models and formalize the concept of reactive KEy-Loss Protection (KELP).},
  author       = {Blackshear, Sam and Chalkias, Konstantinos and Chatzigiannis, Panagiotis and Faizullabhoy, Riyaz and Khaburzaniya, Irakliy and Kokoris Kogias, Eleftherios and Lind, Joshua and Wong, David and Zakian, Tim},
  booktitle    = {FC 2021 Workshops},
  isbn         = {978-3-6626-3957-3},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Virtual},
  pages        = {431--450},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Reactive key-loss protection in blockchains}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-662-63958-0_34},
  volume       = {12676 },
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10108,
  abstract     = {We argue that the time is ripe to investigate differential monitoring, in which the specification of a program's behavior is implicitly given by a second program implementing the same informal specification. Similar ideas have been proposed before, and are currently implemented in restricted form for testing and specialized run-time analyses, aspects of which we combine. We discuss the challenges of implementing differential monitoring as a general-purpose, black-box run-time monitoring framework, and present promising results of a preliminary implementation, showing low monitoring overheads for diverse programs.},
  author       = {Mühlböck, Fabian and Henzinger, Thomas A},
  booktitle    = {International Conference on Runtime Verification},
  isbn         = {978-3-030-88493-2},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  keywords     = {run-time verification, software engineering, implicit specification},
  location     = {Virtual},
  pages        = {231--243},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Differential monitoring}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-88494-9_12},
  volume       = {12974},
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10206,
  abstract     = {Neural-network classifiers achieve high accuracy when predicting the class of an input that they were trained to identify. Maintaining this accuracy in dynamic environments, where inputs frequently fall outside the fixed set of initially known classes, remains a challenge. The typical approach is to detect inputs from novel classes and retrain the classifier on an augmented dataset. However, not only the classifier but also the detection mechanism needs to adapt in order to distinguish between newly learned and yet unknown input classes. To address this challenge, we introduce an algorithmic framework for active monitoring of a neural network. A monitor wrapped in our framework operates in parallel with the neural network and interacts with a human user via a series of interpretable labeling queries for incremental adaptation. In addition, we propose an adaptive quantitative monitor to improve precision. An experimental evaluation on a diverse set of benchmarks with varying numbers of classes confirms the benefits of our active monitoring framework in dynamic scenarios.},
  author       = {Lukina, Anna and Schilling, Christian and Henzinger, Thomas A},
  booktitle    = {21st International Conference on Runtime Verification},
  isbn         = {9-783-0308-8493-2},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  keywords     = {monitoring, neural networks, novelty detection},
  location     = {Virtual},
  pages        = {42--61},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Into the unknown: active monitoring of neural networks}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-88494-9_3},
  volume       = {12974 },
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10324,
  abstract     = {Off-chain protocols (channels) are a promising solution to the scalability and privacy challenges of blockchain payments. Current proposals, however, require synchrony assumptions to preserve the safety of a channel, leaking to an adversary the exact amount of time needed to control the network for a successful attack. In this paper, we introduce Brick, the first payment channel that remains secure under network asynchrony and concurrently provides correct incentives. The core idea is to incorporate the conflict resolution process within the channel by introducing a rational committee of external parties, called wardens. Hence, if a party wants to close a channel unilaterally, it can only get the committee’s approval for the last valid state. Additionally, Brick provides sub-second latency because it does not employ heavy-weight consensus. Instead, Brick uses consistent broadcast to announce updates and close the channel, a light-weight abstraction that is powerful enough to preserve safety and liveness to any rational parties. We formally define and prove for Brick the properties a payment channel construction should fulfill. We also design incentives for Brick such that honest and rational behavior aligns. Finally, we provide a reference implementation of the smart contracts in Solidity.},
  author       = {Avarikioti, Zeta and Kokoris Kogias, Eleftherios and Wattenhofer, Roger and Zindros, Dionysis},
  booktitle    = {25th International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security},
  isbn         = {9-783-6626-4330-3},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Virtual},
  pages        = {209--230},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Brick: Asynchronous incentive-compatible payment channels}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-662-64331-0_11},
  volume       = {12675 },
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10325,
  abstract     = {Since the inception of Bitcoin, a plethora of distributed ledgers differing in design and purpose has been created. While by design, blockchains provide no means to securely communicate with external systems, numerous attempts towards trustless cross-chain communication have been proposed over the years. Today, cross-chain communication (CCC) plays a fundamental role in cryptocurrency exchanges, scalability efforts via sharding, extension of existing systems through sidechains, and bootstrapping of new blockchains. Unfortunately, existing proposals are designed ad-hoc for specific use-cases, making it hard to gain confidence in their correctness and composability. We provide the first systematic exposition of cross-chain communication protocols. We formalize the underlying research problem and show that CCC is impossible without a trusted third party, contrary to common beliefs in the blockchain community. With this result in mind, we develop a framework to design new and evaluate existing CCC protocols, focusing on the inherent trust assumptions thereof, and derive a classification covering the field of cross-chain communication to date. We conclude by discussing open challenges for CCC research and the implications of interoperability on the security and privacy of blockchains.},
  author       = {Zamyatin, Alexei and Al-Bassam, Mustafa and Zindros, Dionysis and Kokoris Kogias, Eleftherios and Moreno-Sanchez, Pedro and Kiayias, Aggelos and Knottenbelt, William J.},
  booktitle    = {25th International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security},
  isbn         = {9-783-6626-4330-3},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Virtual},
  pages        = {3--36},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{SoK: Communication across distributed ledgers}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-662-64331-0_1},
  volume       = {12675 },
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10407,
  abstract     = {Digital hardware Trojans are integrated circuits whose implementation differ from the specification in an arbitrary and malicious way. For example, the circuit can differ from its specified input/output behavior after some fixed number of queries (known as “time bombs”) or on some particular input (known as “cheat codes”). To detect such Trojans, countermeasures using multiparty computation (MPC) or verifiable computation (VC) have been proposed. On a high level, to realize a circuit with specification   F  one has more sophisticated circuits   F⋄  manufactured (where   F⋄  specifies a MPC or VC of   F ), and then embeds these   F⋄ ’s into a master circuit which must be trusted but is relatively simple compared to   F . Those solutions impose a significant overhead as   F⋄  is much more complex than   F , also the master circuits are not exactly trivial. In this work, we show that in restricted settings, where   F  has no evolving state and is queried on independent inputs, we can achieve a relaxed security notion using very simple constructions. In particular, we do not change the specification of the circuit at all (i.e.,   F=F⋄ ). Moreover the master circuit basically just queries a subset of its manufactured circuits and checks if they’re all the same. The security we achieve guarantees that, if the manufactured circuits are initially tested on up to T inputs, the master circuit will catch Trojans that try to deviate on significantly more than a 1/T fraction of the inputs. This bound is optimal for the type of construction considered, and we provably achieve it using a construction where 12 instantiations of   F  need to be embedded into the master. We also discuss an extremely simple construction with just 2 instantiations for which we conjecture that it already achieves the optimal bound.},
  author       = {Chakraborty, Suvradip and Dziembowski, Stefan and Gałązka, Małgorzata and Lizurej, Tomasz and Pietrzak, Krzysztof Z and Yeo, Michelle X},
  isbn         = {9-783-0309-0452-4},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Raleigh, NC, United States},
  pages        = {397--428},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Trojan-resilience without cryptography}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-90453-1_14},
  volume       = {13043},
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10408,
  abstract     = {Key trees are often the best solution in terms of transmission cost and storage requirements for managing keys in a setting where a group needs to share a secret key, while being able to efficiently rotate the key material of users (in order to recover from a potential compromise, or to add or remove users). Applications include multicast encryption protocols like LKH (Logical Key Hierarchies) or group messaging like the current IETF proposal TreeKEM. A key tree is a (typically balanced) binary tree, where each node is identified with a key: leaf nodes hold users’ secret keys while the root is the shared group key. For a group of size N, each user just holds   log(N)  keys (the keys on the path from its leaf to the root) and its entire key material can be rotated by broadcasting   2log(N)  ciphertexts (encrypting each fresh key on the path under the keys of its parents). In this work we consider the natural setting where we have many groups with partially overlapping sets of users, and ask if we can find solutions where the cost of rotating a key is better than in the trivial one where we have a separate key tree for each group. We show that in an asymptotic setting (where the number m of groups is fixed while the number N of users grows) there exist more general key graphs whose cost converges to the cost of a single group, thus saving a factor linear in the number of groups over the trivial solution. As our asymptotic “solution” converges very slowly and performs poorly on concrete examples, we propose an algorithm that uses a natural heuristic to compute a key graph for any given group structure. Our algorithm combines two greedy algorithms, and is thus very efficient: it first converts the group structure into a “lattice graph”, which is then turned into a key graph by repeatedly applying the algorithm for constructing a Huffman code. To better understand how far our proposal is from an optimal solution, we prove lower bounds on the update cost of continuous group-key agreement and multicast encryption in a symbolic model admitting (asymmetric) encryption, pseudorandom generators, and secret sharing as building blocks.},
  author       = {Alwen, Joel F and Auerbach, Benedikt and Baig, Mirza Ahad and Cueto Noval, Miguel and Klein, Karen and Pascual Perez, Guillermo and Pietrzak, Krzysztof Z and Walter, Michael},
  booktitle    = {19th International Conference},
  isbn         = {9-783-0309-0455-5},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Raleigh, NC, United States},
  pages        = {222--253},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Grafting key trees: Efficient key management for overlapping groups}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-90456-2_8},
  volume       = {13044},
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10409,
  abstract     = {We show that Yao’s garbling scheme is adaptively indistinguishable for the class of Boolean circuits of size   S  and treewidth   w  with only a   SO(w)  loss in security. For instance, circuits with constant treewidth are as a result adaptively indistinguishable with only a polynomial loss. This (partially) complements a negative result of Applebaum et al. (Crypto 2013), which showed (assuming one-way functions) that Yao’s garbling scheme cannot be adaptively simulatable. As main technical contributions, we introduce a new pebble game that abstracts out our security reduction and then present a pebbling strategy for this game where the number of pebbles used is roughly   O(δwlog(S)) ,   δ  being the fan-out of the circuit. The design of the strategy relies on separators, a graph-theoretic notion with connections to circuit complexity.  with only a   SO(w)  loss in security. For instance, circuits with constant treewidth are as a result adaptively indistinguishable with only a polynomial loss. This (partially) complements a negative result of Applebaum et al. (Crypto 2013), which showed (assuming one-way functions) that Yao’s garbling scheme cannot be adaptively simulatable. As main technical contributions, we introduce a new pebble game that abstracts out our security reduction and then present a pebbling strategy for this game where the number of pebbles used is roughly   O(δwlog(S)) ,   δ  being the fan-out of the circuit. The design of the strategy relies on separators, a graph-theoretic notion with connections to circuit complexity.},
  author       = {Kamath Hosdurg, Chethan and Klein, Karen and Pietrzak, Krzysztof Z},
  booktitle    = {19th International Conference},
  isbn         = {9-783-0309-0452-4},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Raleigh, NC, United States},
  pages        = {486--517},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{On treewidth, separators and Yao’s garbling}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-90453-1_17},
  volume       = {13043 },
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10410,
  abstract     = {The security of cryptographic primitives and protocols against adversaries that are allowed to make adaptive choices (e.g., which parties to corrupt or which queries to make) is notoriously difficult to establish. A broad theoretical framework was introduced by Jafargholi et al. [Crypto’17] for this purpose. In this paper we initiate the study of lower bounds on loss in adaptive security for certain cryptographic protocols considered in the framework. We prove lower bounds that almost match the upper bounds (proven using the framework) for proxy re-encryption, prefix-constrained PRFs and generalized selective decryption, a security game that captures the security of certain group messaging and broadcast encryption schemes. Those primitives have in common that their security game involves an underlying graph that can be adaptively built by the adversary. Some of our lower bounds only apply to a restricted class of black-box reductions which we term “oblivious” (the existing upper bounds are of this restricted type), some apply to the broader but still restricted class of non-rewinding reductions, while our lower bound for proxy re-encryption applies to all black-box reductions. The fact that some of our lower bounds seem to crucially rely on obliviousness or at least a non-rewinding reduction hints to the exciting possibility that the existing upper bounds can be improved by using more sophisticated reductions. Our main conceptual contribution is a two-player multi-stage game called the Builder-Pebbler Game. We can translate bounds on the winning probabilities for various instantiations of this game into cryptographic lower bounds for the above-mentioned primitives using oracle separation techniques.},
  author       = {Kamath Hosdurg, Chethan and Klein, Karen and Pietrzak, Krzysztof Z and Walter, Michael},
  booktitle    = {19th International Conference},
  isbn         = {9-783-0309-0452-4},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Raleigh, NC, United States},
  pages        = {550--581},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{The cost of adaptivity in security games on graphs}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-90453-1_19},
  volume       = {13043},
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10414,
  abstract     = {We consider the almost-sure (a.s.) termination problem for probabilistic programs, which are a stochastic extension of classical imperative programs. Lexicographic ranking functions provide a sound and practical approach for termination of non-probabilistic programs, and their extension to probabilistic programs is achieved via lexicographic ranking supermartingales (LexRSMs). However, LexRSMs introduced in the previous work have a limitation that impedes their automation: all of their components have to be non-negative in all reachable states. This might result in LexRSM not existing even for simple terminating programs. Our contributions are twofold: First, we introduce a generalization of LexRSMs which allows for some components to be negative. This standard feature of non-probabilistic termination proofs was hitherto not known to be sound in the probabilistic setting, as the soundness proof requires a careful analysis of the underlying stochastic process. Second, we present polynomial-time algorithms using our generalized LexRSMs for proving a.s. termination in broad classes of linear-arithmetic programs.},
  author       = {Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Goharshady, Ehsan Kafshdar and Novotný, Petr and Zárevúcky, Jiří and Zikelic, Dorde},
  booktitle    = {24th International Symposium on Formal Methods},
  isbn         = {9-783-0309-0869-0},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Virtual},
  pages        = {619--639},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{On lexicographic proof rules for probabilistic termination}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-90870-6_33},
  volume       = {13047},
  year         = {2021},
}

@inproceedings{10609,
  abstract     = {We study Multi-party computation (MPC) in the setting of subversion, where the adversary tampers with the machines of honest parties. Our goal is to construct actively secure MPC protocols where parties are corrupted adaptively by an adversary (as in the standard adaptive security setting), and in addition, honest parties’ machines are compromised.
The idea of reverse firewalls (RF) was introduced at EUROCRYPT’15 by Mironov and Stephens-Davidowitz as an approach to protecting protocols against corruption of honest parties’ devices. Intuitively, an RF for a party   P  is an external entity that sits between   P  and the outside world and whose scope is to sanitize   P ’s incoming and outgoing messages in the face of subversion of their computer. Mironov and Stephens-Davidowitz constructed a protocol for passively-secure two-party computation. At CRYPTO’20, Chakraborty, Dziembowski and Nielsen constructed a protocol for secure computation with firewalls that improved on this result, both by extending it to multi-party computation protocol, and considering active security in the presence of static corruptions. In this paper, we initiate the study of RF for MPC in the adaptive setting. We put forward a definition for adaptively secure MPC in the reverse firewall setting, explore relationships among the security notions, and then construct reverse firewalls for MPC in this stronger setting of adaptive security. We also resolve the open question of Chakraborty, Dziembowski and Nielsen by removing the need for a trusted setup in constructing RF for MPC. Towards this end, we construct reverse firewalls for adaptively secure augmented coin tossing and adaptively secure zero-knowledge protocols and obtain a constant round adaptively secure MPC protocol in the reverse firewall setting without setup. Along the way, we propose a new multi-party adaptively secure coin tossing protocol in the plain model, that is of independent interest.},
  author       = {Chakraborty, Suvradip and Ganesh, Chaya and Pancholi, Mahak and Sarkar, Pratik},
  booktitle    = {27th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security},
  isbn         = {978-3-030-92074-6},
  issn         = {1611-3349},
  location     = {Virtual, Singapore},
  pages        = {335--364},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Reverse firewalls for adaptively secure MPC without setup}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-030-92075-3_12},
  volume       = {13091},
  year         = {2021},
}

